Roadmapping implementation in digital startups: cases of study in agile environment
Ana Carolina dos Santos Paes, Aline Calamita Soares, Isadora Marques Lima, Leonel Del Rey de Melo Filho, Matheus Luiz Pontelo de Souza
Startups are conquering relevant space in the market. This way to make entrepreneurship has singular features, such as resource limitations and extreme uncertain environment. In this context, using auxiliary tools for managing the business and technology can be potentially helpful. There are many tools for managing product development in large companies. These tools are not immediately applicable when greater agility is required, as in startups. Thus, the purpose of this article is to analyze the use of roadmapping in the context of digital entrepreneurship and to describe factors that may be considered essential for the success or failure of implementation. The methodology in this paper was multiple cases of studies involving interviews with three entrepreneurs of different startups. After analyzing and comparing the data and contextualizing them in theory, four main factors affecting the use of roadmapping in startups were found: lack of theoretical knowledge, the specific moment of the startup in its life cycle, team involvement with roadmapping process and methods associated with roadmapping. These factors are debated, difficulties are shown and comments about method implementation are described.
Armellini, F., Pelicioni, R. A., Kaminski, P. C., & Bassetto, S. (2017). Including the voice of the client in the creative process: a case study of the integration of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to the Value Proposition Design (VPD) in the service sector. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(2)
Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63-72.
Bouchereau, V., & Rowlands, H. (2000). Methods and techniques to help Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Benchmarking, 7(1), 8-20.
Brito, D. (2018, July). Startups crescem no Brasil e consolidam nova geração de empreendedores. Agência Brasil. Retrieved in 2019, March 18, from http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/economia/noticia/2018-07/startups-crescem-no-brasil-econsolidam-nova-geracao-de-empreendedores
Carlos, R., Amaral, D. C., & Caetano, M. (2018). Framework for continuous agile technology roadmap updating. Innovation & Management Review, 15(3), 321-336.
Carvalho, M. M., Fleury, A., & Lopes, A. P. (2013). An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): contributions and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1418-1437.
Cheng, L. C. (2003). QFD in product development: methodological characteristics and a guide for intervention. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1), 107-112.
Cheng, L. C., & Melo Filho, L. (2013). QFD: desdobramento da função qualidade na gestão de desenvolvimento de produtos. São Paulo: Blücher.
Denning, S. (2018). The age of agile: how smart companies are transforming the way work gets done. New York: AMACOM.
Freitas, J. S. (2014). Eventos críticos para a formação de centros tecnológicos de origem acadêmica [Doctoral Dissertation]. Centro de Pós-graduação e Pesquisas em Administração, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
Freitas, J., Mudrik, J., Melo, J., Bagno, R., & Oliveira, M. (2017). On the combination of strategy and innovation tools with roadmapping: exploring taxonomies and sequences. In Proceedings of the 26th International Association for Management of Technology Conference (IAMOT); 2017;
Vienna. Vienna: IAMOT; 2017. p. 578-592. Gerdsri, N., Vatananan, R. S., & Dansamasatid, S. (2009). Dealing with the dynamics of technology roadmapping implementation: a case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 50-60.
Heise, D. R., & Durig, A. (1997). A frame for organizational actions and macroactions. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22(2), 95-123.
Kerr, C., & Phaal, R. (2020). Technology roadmapping: industrial roots, forgotten history and unknown origins. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119967.
Kerr, C., Phaal, R., & Thams, K. (2019). Customising and deploying roadmapping in an organisational setting: the LEGO Group experience. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 52, 48-60.
Lee, S., & Park, Y. (2005). Customization of technology roadmaps according to roadmapping purposes: overall process and detailed modules. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(5), 567-583.
Meyer, J. (2012). Welcome to entrepreneur country. London: Hachette UK.
Oliveira, M., Freitas, J., Fleury, A., Rozenfeld, H., Phaal, R., Probert, D., & Cheng, L. (2012). Roadmapping: uma abordagem estratégica para o gerenciamento da inovação em produtos, serviços e tecnologias. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Phaal, R., & Muller, G. (2009). An architectural framework for roadmapping: towards visual strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 39-49.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J., & Probert, D. R. (2004b). Technology roadmapping: a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 5-26.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J., & Probert, D. R. (2010). Roadmapping for strategy and innovation: aligning technology and markets in a dynamic world. Cambridge: Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., & Probert, D. (2004a). Customizing roadmapping. Research Technology Management, 47(2), 26-37.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., & Probert, D. (2006). Technology management tools: generalization, integration and configuration. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 3(03), 321-339.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., & Probert, D. R. (2013). Fast-start roadmapping workshop approaches. In M. Moehrle, R. Isenmann & R. Phaal (Eds.), Technology roadmapping for strategy and innovation (pp. 91-106). Berlin: Springer.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Publishing.
Ries, E. (2017). The startup way: how modern companies use entrepreneurial management to transform culture and drive long-term growth. New York: Currency.
Souza, M. L. P. (2018). Empreendedorismo tecnológico: processo de geração de startups (p-start) e métodos de suporte ao reconhecimento, criação e exploração de oportunidades [Master’s Thesis]. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
Souza, M. L. P., Melo Filho, L. D. R., Oliveira, C. G. G., Aniceto, M. D., & Silveira, C. A. (2017). Aplicação conjunta de métodos no desenvolvimento de startups: descrição e análise crítica. In Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Inovação e Gestão de Desenvolvimento do Produto (CBGDP) (pp. 725-734). São Paulo: USP.
Souza, M. L., Melo Filho, L. D., Bagno, R. B., Souza, W. C., & Cheng, L. C. (2018, August). A process model integrated to innovation management tools to support technology entrepreneurship. In 2018Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (pp. 1-12). Piscataway: IEEE.
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 195-219.
Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., & Dumay, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: an interdisciplinary structured literature review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119735.